What RFFs need in order to develop
The existing and emerging RFFs are different in terms of their structure, resources, experience and the context in which they are working. This report has shown that, even though there are these differences, each RFF has the potential to build on its experience and contribute significantly to its region in terms of, relationship between faith communities and regional governance, building the capacity of faith communities for social action and contributing to developing cohesion and resilient communities.
In taking this forward, the better developed RFFs should not be held back while the others catch up; it will not be possible to create a 'level playing field' where each RFF gets the same resources, the regional differences are too great. Neither will a 'one size fits all' approach to the way the RFFs are constituted be beneficial, it is not appropriate to the needs of the different regions, and would undo valuable work, and create frustration.
However the needs of RFFs to develop most effectively and appropriately in their region are markedly similar. The evidence gathered for this report and the experience of FbRN in this field indicate that the needs of RFFs are:
Secure funding for core staff
Core staff will be able to develop the RFF and implement its programme of work. Having core staff will provide a firm basis for building up other work strategically and securing additional resources. It will help the RFF to be more resilient and able to focus on its core work while choosing to use other funding streams if appropriate. Funding should be secure for a minimum period of three years.
A good relationship with the structures of regional governance
There are some very good examples of how this can work and the benefits that can ensue. These examples should be disseminated and regions facilitated to learn from each other. Staff in some of the regional structures should be encouraged and enabled to appreciate the value of working with the RFF; this may include training.
Coherent policy and implementation
It is sometimes the case that initiatives from government, or sponsored by government departments, when experienced at the level of the RFF, can cut across each other. Better coordination between government departments on policies that have an impact on faith communities would benefit the work of RFFs and others in the regions.
Some government initiatives have created the impression that some faith communities are being targeted, either for favourable treatment or restrictions. The atmosphere that this creates makes the work of the RFF in bringing the faith communities together, more difficult.
A network for sharing ideas and learning from each other
The RFFs have recently set up an English Regional Faith Forums Network (ERFFN). This is facilitated by the Inter Faith Network for the UK and the Faith Based Regeneration Network UK. A basic website is also being constructed. The aims of ERFFN are, to help RFFs to keep in touch with each other and to exchange resources and good practice, to work together on issues of common concern. This useful networking should be encouraged and resourced, but it should not develop a centralised and bureaucratic structure nor become a separate organisation.